Breaking: Autonomous Agents are a Shitshow

Marcus On AI

new study from researchers from Stanford, MIT CSAIL, Carnegie Mellon, ITU Copenhagen, and NVIDIA and Elloe AI Labs, examining 847 autonomous agent deployments drawn from healthcare, finance, customer service and code-generation, showed that 91% were vulnerable to subtle but dangerous tool-chaining attacks

Additionally, in the new study 89.4% of agents showed drift relative to their goals after about 30 steps in their process, and 94% of agents with some form of memory-augmentation were vulnerable to poisoning attacks.

Importantly the new paper shows that agents are in many ways much more vulnerable than pure (“stateless”) LLMs

Discuss

Here is where members can discuss, give feedback, and present their ideas within the “Breaking: Autonomous Agents are a Shitshow” post. OnAir membership is required to participate.

The lead moderator for the discussions is Zeinab Shariff. We enforce civil, honest, and respectful discourse across our network of hubs. For more information on commenting and giving feedback, see our Community Guidelines.

This is an open discussion on this news piece.

Home Forums Open Discussion

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Skip to toolbar