AI can out-produce code, but it can’t connect the dots

Source: Engineering Unleashed, Alexandre BarretoJune 22, 2026

AI can out-produce code, but it can’t connect the dots: Rethinking Cyber Engineering Curriculum through Entrepreneurially Minded Learning (EML).

The other day, I was chatting with my daughter, who is an architect. We were discussing the anxiety around AI taking over tech jobs.

I told her, “I don’t think software architects are going anywhere. But developers? Many of their traditional roles will likely vanish.”

Then the real problem hit us.

How do you become a great architect? You spend years as a junior, mid-level, and senior developer. You learn by doing, failing, and executing.

If AI eats the bottom of that ladder, where does the next generation of senior strategists come from? This is exactly the crisis facing Cybersecurity Engineering.

We probably won’t need armies of pentesters who memorize standard attack tooling; AI already generates that faster than any human can type.

What we’ll desperately need are engineers who connect business risk, human behavior, and complex systems to anticipate the attacks nobody has scripted yet.

I’m convinced the answer is Entrepreneurially Minded Learning (EML), the framework developed by KEEN (the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network), built on a simple equation: Mindset + Skillset.

Curiosity (chase the context not given in the prompt). Connections (link technical decisions to other domains). Value Creation (security as business survival, not serverlocking).

AI owns the Skillset now. The Mindset is the part that’s still entirely human, and it’s the part most curricula still don’t teach on purpose.

But I’ll say the hard part out loud instead of skipping past it: mindset alone doesn’t build judgment.

Judgment used to come from a decade of breaking things as a junior. If that decade disappears, EML has to do something harder than “teach curiosity”; it has to compress or replace the scar tissue that once came from years in the trenches.

That’s the real test, and it’s the one I think most programs claiming to “future-proof” students aren’t actually solving. I believe it’s solvable. I don’t think it’s solved yet, anywhere, including in my own classroom.

So here’s my challenge to this network: if junior execution roles disappear before students graduate, what builds the judgment that used to come from trenches?

I’ll defend EML as the right starting point. I want to hear why I’m wrong, or what’s missing. Educators, CISOs, hiring managers: disagree with me in the comments. That’s where this gets useful.

Discuss

Here is where members can discuss, give feedback, and present their ideas within the “AI can out-produce code, but it can’t connect the dots” post. OnAir membership is required to participate.

The lead moderator for the discussions is onAir Curators. We enforce civil, honest, and respectful discourse across our network of hubs. For more information on commenting and giving feedback, see our Community Guidelines.

This is an open discussion on this news piece.

Home Forums Open Discussion

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Skip to toolbar